<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.8" -->
<?xml-stylesheet href="https://dev-urandom.eu/lib/exe/css.php?s=feed" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel xmlns:g="http://base.google.com/ns/1.0">
        <title>/int/ Minecraft talk:decisions</title>
        <description></description>
        <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 09:48:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.8</generator>
        
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:arbitration</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:arbitration?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>Talk

v1ad - a claims dispute, please read so that we can discuss the validity of my claim/defense obligation to Montequercus, v. Waldsic

&lt;http://dev-urandom.eu/doku.php/settlements:montequercus&gt;

&lt;http://dev-urandom.eu/doku.php/nations:battx8&gt;

&lt;http://dev-urandom.eu/doku.php/nations:waldsican_empire&gt;</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:areteeevsppa</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:areteeevsppa?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>Pig Disgusting Aboos. Feels like walefinow all over again. -Venomthrope-

	&quot;If it there is no law that says it is allowed, then it is illegal
This is what areteee actually believes&quot;

That's not how law works. If there's no precedent in law then whatever comes out of this becomes a precedent to make a law. It's not legal but it's isn't illegal either. Laws restrict more than they allow. You could use the actual legal principle that</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:bans</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:bans?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>So this page is reserved for Kovio right? - Green 


I intend and encourage all other mods to keep track of all bans here. t. mazznoff 


I remember when I used to propose all this shit and nobody listen. Fuck you all. Demodded unfairly. I demand a trial.</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:battleresults</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:battleresults?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>Moreover, regarding the second topic, I think the involved parties should be penalized for not complying the established rules. We have rules and breaking them ought to end in punishment.  --- caBastard 2012/07/09 21:02

The battle of the desert was a raid, the soviets were in discussions with Sikandar due to our timezones not matching. But Sikandar dissappeared without telling anyone, a minor edit in the wiki should not count as informing as not everyone checks the wiki every day. The Soviets d…</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:cheating_in_battles</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:cheating_in_battles?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>Obviously those caught cheating during a planned battle should be swiftly punished. I can understand that people are wary of going to battle with any suspected user of that client. It seems harsh to punish people before the crime is actually committed though. There are plenty of legitimate uses that enrich the server of this client, by making building easier for example, and a precedent even endorsed by an admin for not punishing to extremely for this.</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:constitution_and_criminal_law</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:constitution_and_criminal_law?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>Discuss here, make your own article to formally propose your shit. 

But constitution is already here :DD

	* No malicious griefing
		* No malicious griefing
		* Don't go around killing people at random and generally being a dick. See Battle agreements</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:decisions</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:decisions?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>I hope I'm doing this right by creating this page :I
Anyway, what are decisions and how do they work?  A summary at the top of the page about proceedure would be very helpful. -Juinn

pretty self explanatory, decisions by the mods/admins.  click for more detail -vlad</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:geo_section</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:geo_section?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>See: landmarks  --- Sikandar 2013/02/13 04:01

This is the reason landmarks was created, but nobody wants to use it.  --- YugoTexas 2013/02/13 08:46
It seems to me landmarks is more shit people build. &lt;http://dev-urandom.eu/doku.php/geographical:start&gt;  this section should be in the landmarks place</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:halloweencontest</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:halloweencontest?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>&quot;dat awards&quot;

nice idea, although #int eightball says that this contest will bring no attention and will suck balls
---Rosen</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:injungivun</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:injungivun?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>&quot;Build bombard towers in ally town
Set stance to enemy.
? ? ? ? ?
PROFIT!!&quot;

 --- Juinn 2013/09/21 06:03

I vote no --- Sikandar 2013/04/04 06:03

No.  --- hino 2013/04/04 06:04

I don.t grief other peoples proposals, I expect the same respect back.

Perhaps the settlement should have to pay reparations in material + time cost translated to materials if they don't want their buildings removed.</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:katten_bill</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:katten_bill?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>LOL
I'd like to point out that landrun isn't crime, only some sort of bitch move ( and it feels nice that caBst takes care in restricting that ). 
---Rosenmann

Actually it is and we mods can take a stand against it. It has been historically that way, It is just not a bannable offense.</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:koviocaveats</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:koviocaveats?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>&quot; Will hand the stolen loot to Tangaloa&quot;

I am assuming this is the original loot from when kovio killed buddel in Eienkyo, not the spoils of war.

	&quot; Will not go after Buddel&quot;

Can you guarantee that Buddel won't attack us then? Because he comes into our lands and begins to attack us then gets butthurt when we kill him.</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:koviovsshako</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:koviovsshako?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>(5:41:14 AM) AlphaBernd: kovio, miklos    outside of that enclave the 1000 block limit still applies for you two

just adding that incase some other mod doesn't like the enclave  --- green kitten 2013/02/19 19:46</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:map_stagnation_bill</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:map_stagnation_bill?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>Why a new world? not happy with new spawn?  --- green kitten 2013/01/03 16:43

The map isn't even stagnant. It was less active only a few months ago.</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:mobgrinders</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:mobgrinders?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>It may be prudent to set a different limit for blaze farms, as they seem to cause intense lag locally.

	*  All I really care about is server lag. Turn off particles or something. --te3

Maybe someone could make it possible to switch off a blaze grinder by adding water and pistons and redstone. Since blaze grinders are only in nether, they should anyhow be okay with the rules as long as people dont farm several hundreds of mobs, right?</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:mongol_scum_bill</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:mongol_scum_bill?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>So here we've come to this point again, a great nation about to be desolved due to their leader's utter disregard for the common law all nations must abide by in this realm to hold any Legitmacy.



Today we have listened as the leaders of the Katten Khannate have declared the International Rules of Engagement to be nonbinding, and invalid in their dispute with the Soviet Republic over a worthless patch of sand, much in the same fashion the People's Republic of Wildedale wrecklessly did during a…</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:mystery_rules_update</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:mystery_rules_update?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>OP

Okay, I've been playing with some ideas to

	*  put moderation more into the hands of the players
	*  while minimizing perceived mod abuse,
	*  make PVP less rule-encrusted
	*  without ruining the game for peaceful players.
	*  bother me with player and politics issues as little as possible in the future.</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:plugin-proposal</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:plugin-proposal?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>Revised Discussion

I'm going to abandon this page and work out a page for user plugin petitions since that seems to be the way to go. --- Juinn TODAY

I like the idea of using only the informational aspects, in fact, I proposed this months/years ago. Just updating so we can get some staff response.</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:ppasshako</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:ppasshako?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>Moved</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:reduce-map</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:reduce-map?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>This is not the overhaul we need, Shako. Nor what the server needs.  --- Ranshiin Dragonbro 2013/01/10 12:56

The world already has a limit, its a large one but its fine.  --- green kitten 2013/01/11 15:33</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:rules</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:rules?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>How dare you call the Rules of the kurwan wars Dated?</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:server-law</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:server-law?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>* I feel like the actual laws of the land should have their own page (for the oredung), and that that page and its dependencies should be locked from unprivileged editing.  I appeal to higher judgements however. - Juinn

*It's fine as it is imho. No unpriviledged person changes it anyway. And even if one did, it can be reverted in a matter of seconds</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:tora</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:tora?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>Nope and Nope t: Ghoul.

Tora wilfully joined Katten, what is the fucking issue then?  --- YugoTexas 2012/07/05 20:01


Toa willing joined the Katten Khanate, and we are both actively helping eachother even with plans to expand Tora. We're all working together, and this is in no way hostile, or political intimidation. We are helping pave a better future for Tora and the Toran people. It's not like you can kick the active citizens of Tora off their land. -kovio</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:venom_mod_abuse</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:venom_mod_abuse?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>While the complain itself is understandable, i don't think it counts as “Mod abuse”.

Just make it so that Venom doesn't let his prejudice get in the way of his mod duties anymore, then carry on.

Also, we really need that rulebook overhaul. You've got a point on that, atleast.</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:war_reform</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:war_reform?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>Discussion

I think raids should steer away from being settlement grief attacks to personnel attacks; meaning you attack the players unannounced, not their buildings.  Because it's a big map and there's a lot of damage that could be done that might not get noticed in time for roll-backs.  Plus PvP is more of what people want when it comes to war I think.  Incidental chest raiding, bed breaking, sign leaving would still be fine I think.</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>talk:decisions:yugobill</title>
            <link>https://dev-urandom.eu/talk:decisions:yugobill?rev=1604804538&amp;do=diff</link>
            <description>I suggest permabanning him on wiki, this has gone too far. - mazznoff


but then who will make new articles relating to his autism when he gets unbanned from politics?  --- green kitten 2012/07/14 15:41


you.  ---Rosenmann 

I have enough to write about with my autism, never mind someone else's</description>
            <author>anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous)</author>
        <category>talk:decisions</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
